top of page



Diversity into Dollars: Rethinking What Forage Is Really Worth
This past Friday morning, I was sitting in my local coffee shop, enjoying a cup of joe and catching up on the latest Our Amazing Grasslands video from the South Dakota Grassland Coalition. As I watched, I saw a few familiar faces pop up on the screen—SDSU’s Pete Bauman, that larger-than-life dynamo (seriously, where does he get his energy?); Josh Lefers, the rancher-philosopher who also happens to be Audubon Dakota’s Director of Conservation; Mike McKernan, a boots-on-the-gr
2 min read


“Long Rotations Leave Too Much on the Table!” Really?
Over the past few weeks, the tillage and no-till debate has sparked surprising and passionate discussion among our readers. We've...
3 min read


No-Till, No Yield? Are We Putting Corn Above Soybean Yields?
As a response to several requests for more peer-reviewed material on the economics of no-till (NT) vs. conventional tillage (CT), I went digging into the usual suspects — input costs, yield comparisons, and long-term trials. That’s when I stumbled on research from South Dakota State University’s Beresford Research Farm that made me realize: I had a bias . In an earlier blog , we cited a meta-analysis showing no-till yields averaging 5.7% lower overall compared to conventiona
3 min read
bottom of page
